Building a new eCommerce store from scratch or changing your tech stack can be a tedious and time-consuming endeavor. That’s why it’s crucial to choose the right solution for your business. Basically, there are two paths you can follow: 

  1. Monolithic  
  2. Microservices-oriented

This blog post will explore the pros and cons of each approach (monolithic vs. microservices-oriented architecture) and help you decide which is best for improving your eCommerce business performance. We’ll also discuss when it might be beneficial to switch from one to the other and how to do it without risk to your daily operations and budget. Yes, it is possible! So let’s jump right in.

Microservices vs. monolithic architecture: Making the right choice

Wisely choosing between a monolithic application or one that leverages a microservices architecture is essential for the future of your eCommerce business. They both offer unique solutions to critical technical and business needs such as:

- Great SEO performance

- Flexibility to change and update features 

- Scalability

- High ROI

- Short Time-To-Market

- Agility

These two types of architecture can deliver robust and diverse apps, but their code base and functionality look vastly different, and each serves unique business needs. 

The complexity and size of your business will be a significant factor in deciding whether to go with microservices vs. monolithic legacy systems. Your plans for expansion and need to scale are variables that can convince you to start migrating from an all-in-one legacy system to a versatile headless microservices-oriented one.

Monolithic vs. microservices
Monolithic vs. Microservices-oriented architecture

The differences between microservices and monoliths

Microservices and monoliths are two popular approaches for building online stores. Both have specific benefits, and choosing which to use depends on the project’s particular needs.



Microservices have gained unprecedented traction in recent years. This architecture breaks down an eCommerce system into smaller, independent services that communicate with each other via APIs. This approach makes development and deployment more manageable, as each service can be developed and deployed separately. 

Using microservices is a modern and practical approach to meeting evolving user needs and experiences that are becoming increasingly important, especially in enterprise projects.

The basic concept is to split up applications into small, self-contained services that can be deployed and updated separately from the rest of the system. This allows for more speed, flexibility, and scalability as they can be deployed on different servers and scaled independently.

Business leaders often raise their concerns that microservices can be more complex to develop and deploy than monolithic applications. Fortunately, this issue is quickly becoming something that is easily addressed. Microservice developers are focusing on performance-oriented software development that aligns with SEO and UX performance metrics and offers customizable OOTB (out-of-the-box) solutions

Monolithic approach

On the other hand, monolith architecture is a more traditional approach where the entire application is built as a single unit. This can make development and deployment more straightforward, but it also makes the application slower and more challenging to scale.

The main disadvantage of monolithic applications is that they are more complex to update and maintain than microservices. Additionally, because all components are bundled together, it is an almost impossible task to scale individual parts of the application.

Monoliths vs. microservices: Operational differences that impact your eCommerce businesses 

So, what are the critical operational differences between microservices and monoliths? Let’s take a look:


The large code base makes it harder for developers and QAs to understand the code and business knowledge. You need bigger IT teams as the code base grows.

The pluggability of a microservices application architecture allows for easier and faster development. The architecture allows cross-functional teams to develop services independently, which leads to faster turnaround times.


With a monolith, you often have to test the entire application as a whole, which is more complex.

Microservices are easier to test because you can test each service independently. 


With a monolith, you have to deploy the entire application simultaneously, which can be more complex, error-prone, and time-consuming.

With microservices, you can deploy individual services independently, making it much easier to roll out new features or updates. 


Monoliths are often impossible to scale, leaving you with no option but to re-platform or re-build when the business grows and expands.

Microservices are much easier to scale than monoliths. You can simply add more service instances, new markets (perfect for multistore developments), and new products when you need to increase capacity.

Fault tolerance

If one part of the application fails with a monolith, the entire system may go down.

Microservices are more fault-tolerant than monoliths because a single service can continue working even if another service fails.

Monoliths vs. microservices: Operational differences
Monoliths vs. microservices: Operational differences that impact your eCommerce businesses 

Monolith vs. microservices: pros and cons of both architectures

To make an informed business decision about the technology stack you need to drive your eCommerce business into the future, it’s vital to know the facts about your options. In the next section, we analyze both architectures and summarize the following:

Monolithic architecture: Advantages

These all-in-one solutions tend not only to be more difficult but also brittle. Within this architecture, developers design various layers of functions such as presentation, service, and persistence—and then deploy them as a single jar/war file. 

One advantage of monolithic architecture is that it is a robust all-in-one system with a plethora of features. They provide all the components needed for handling business logic, displaying UI layers, managing and publishing content, and more with a single, tightly coupled codebase. 

For many years monolith systems represented a seemingly convenient “all-in-one” approach and guaranteed complete control of the system for eCommerce businesses. However, over time, and with rapidly changing user behavior, their drawbacks became a blocker to eCommerce businesses needing to scale and diversify to meet market trends and demands.

In addition, these types of systems make it challenging if you need additional features added post-launch since all changes must go through the codebase itself - braces included.

Monolithic architecture: Disadvantages

Monolithic architecture has distinct disadvantages in the modern eCommerce landscape. It’s vital for eCommerce businesses to fully understand these challenges when making decisions about the future of their eCommerce business.


A significant downside of monolithic architecture is that it is hard to update and maintain, blocking marketing teams from upgrading a specific product, campaign, or component.


A centralized architecture does not allow for broader collaboration between independent dev teams. You need larger in-house or subcontractors teams, which affects revenue and ROI.


You are limited to working with only one technology, which more often than not makes it challenging to integrate with other applications or APIs. This affects UX and performance.


A bug can potentially crash your entire environment, while it can take weeks to identify and isolate the hot spot as you need to scan hundreds of lines of code. This directly affects your conversion rates and, ultimately, your bottom line.


Vertical scaling makes monoliths difficult and expensive to scale as additional computational resources are added. This leads to lengthy and costly development cycles.


Because the whole system is tightly linked, an issue anywhere in the code can take down an entire application, which is detrimental to your daily operations and sales. 

When evaluating microservices vs. monolithic on a case-by-case basis, the latter can still be a workable option for meeting the needs of a smaller organization. But only if you’re not planning for expansion into new markets and product lines.

Microservices: Advantages and benefits

A graph indicating the effectiveness of microservices architecture for more complex systems.
The effectiveness of microservices architecture for more complex systems. Source: Edvantis

Microservices are small application pieces that work together to provide a single service. The architecture comprises these protocols and does not include any heavy lifting like networking or persistence. This means it can be faster for developers interested in building fast, scalable systems with high availability rates.

Microservices offer both business and technical performance-related advantages over traditional monolithic architectures. While some challenges need to be considered when adopting a microservices-based approach, the benefits far outweigh the drawbacks.

Microservice-style applications communicate directly via APIs without going through centralized points. So instead of your app having many different types and sizes of services, each component will only need lightweight libraries provided by their respective vendor frameworks.

This API-first approach is the secret sauce to many of the benefits offered by microservices in terms of performance and scalability: 

Microservice architecture is an excellent solution for maintaining data integrity because each microservice has its own database. If one service experiences a problem, other services won’t be affected. This also enables each application to use the database best suited to its needs.

Key microservices principles:

1. They are built around business capabilities: Microservices won’t restrict themselves from adopting appropriate tech stacks or a backend database storage most suitable for solving specific business problems. They can adapt on a per-case basis.

2. They have a single responsibility: This forms a part of the SOLID design pattern. It simplifies any microservice by delivering only one core functionality. So, if you need five functionalities, you need five microservices with five separate databases.

3. They are designed with failure cases in mind: It will not affect the entire system when one microservice goes down. This is a crucial reason why they are increasingly popular in eCommerce businesses. All other functionalities remain intact when one module fails.

Business advantages of microservices vs. monolithic:

Business advantages of microservices vs. monolithic:  

Technical advantages of microservices vs. monoliths:

Technical advantages of microservices vs. monoliths:  

Let’s wrap it up: How to choose the best architecture for your business?

We hope you gained the needed insight into the trending microservices vs. monolithic debate. If you need a scalable, flexible, and modifiable eCommerce system, we can boldly state that a microservices architecture is the best choice for your business.


What is the difference between microservices and monolithic?

Monolithics are standalone applications with one single codebase. A microservice is a small application designed for performing just one dedicated task as part of a more extensive system to complete an entire application.

Is microservices better than monolithic?

Yes. Microservices architecture is a modern approach to building an application based on multiple modules. A microservice is a small component that can easily be replaced, independently developed, and installed, saving you time and money. It allows independence in the development and freedom of choice of tools (language, framework) within each application.

Is headless eCommerce a microservice? 

Headless commerce is one way to go about implementing microservices. It allows for the independent functioning of different aspects of your website, with only some parts being decoupled to complete tasks at hand without compromising quality or performance. With more and more headless commerce solutions taking the eCommerce industry by storm, it is vital to understand how microservices fit into the picture—and vice versa.

Can a business move from monolith to microservices without risk?

Yes. The digital transformation from Monolith to Microservices architecture is an essential and much-needed step to prepare your eCommerce platform for future market changes and technological advancements. You can take a phased approach when migrating to minimize any operational risks.